The junk ‘science’ behind anti-‘hate’

When a psychologist dares to research politically contentious issues such as a link between race and IQ and comes up with the ‘wrong answer’, they automatically come under fire for a purely assumed motivation without any further evidence to justify the presumption of bias. But where is the outcry when psychologists confuse value judgements such as “homophobia” with valid scientific constructs and proceed to research them? Wasn’t the word “homophobia” invented for explicitly political reasons? Who decides on the double standard?

Such research is little more than an attempt to stigmatise political opinions as akin to mental illnesses – like former attempts to medicalise and ‘cure’ homosexuality itself.

Is Some Homophobia Self-Phobia?
Link

Advertisements

About skadhitheraverner
I'm a young freelance writer from the UK, with an interest in anthropology, the outdoors and rightist politics.

5 Responses to The junk ‘science’ behind anti-‘hate’

  1. swissmister says:

    The homosexual agenda was invented and is motivated by gay envy of the family unit.

    • I’m sick of hearing about how homosexuals themselves have always been here when today’s Gaystapo are unprecedented in human history.

      I don’t see psychological research into the chip many homosexuals seem to carry round on their shoulder.

  2. Preußentum says:

    Nice to see a fellow Alt-Right commenter started a blog, I’ve been considering starting on myself.
    Homosexuals seem to have the negative traits of women amplified by several thousand percent (narcissism, gossipy and bitchy behaviour, willingness to backstab, inability to distinguish between emotion and intellect). This study recalls a study about Australians (of which I am one) who display the flag on Australia Day being more “racist” than Australians who didn’t go in for such patriotic displays. Note the name the study’s lead author “Netta Weinstein”.

    • The word is ‘junk science’ – it looks like real science but is manufactured for a political cause, whereas real science is impartial, or at least attempts to be.

      You will notice junk science right away in many cases because the research started with the assumption that subjective and ill-defined categories of value judgement (“homophobia”, “racism”) are valid scientific concepts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: